<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A sneaky little idea.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anirudhsanjeev.org/a-sneaky-little-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anirudhsanjeev.org/a-sneaky-little-idea/</link>
	<description>And with Oden on our side, we are victorious</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:32:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://anirudhsanjeev.org/a-sneaky-little-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anirudhsanjeev.org/a-sneaky-little-idea/#comment-609</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;IANAL, but I think something has to qualify as a &#039;literary work&#039; before it can be copyrighted. You can&#039;t just write &#039;cow&#039; and expect a copyright on that. Or &#039;The cow is fat&#039;, or &#039;The cow is fat and has four legs&#039;. So a chat conversation would be exempt, unless you do manage to produce a &#039;literary work&#039; over instant messenger.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IANAL, but I think something has to qualify as a &#8216;literary work&#8217; before it can be copyrighted. You can&#8217;t just write &#8216;cow&#8217; and expect a copyright on that. Or &#8216;The cow is fat&#8217;, or &#8216;The cow is fat and has four legs&#8217;. So a chat conversation would be exempt, unless you do manage to produce a &#8216;literary work&#8217; over instant messenger.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iluv</title>
		<link>http://anirudhsanjeev.org/a-sneaky-little-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>iluv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anirudhsanjeev.org/a-sneaky-little-idea/#comment-608</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not too sure about chat(or shared conversations in general), but the Berne convention definitely applies to email. Therefore, as long as you haven&#039;t explicitly revoked your rights(and, at least with gmail, you haven&#039;t), you own them. Sending it out doesn&#039;t change anything.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;IM, I&#039;m not sure about. My guess is you&#039;d have to treat IM the same as email, only speeded up a lot. In this case you&#039;d own copyright on your half of the conversation. Of course, IANAL, talk to a real lawyer before doing anything dangerous.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not too sure about chat(or shared conversations in general), but the Berne convention definitely applies to email. Therefore, as long as you haven&#8217;t explicitly revoked your rights(and, at least with gmail, you haven&#8217;t), you own them. Sending it out doesn&#8217;t change anything.</p>

<p>IM, I&#8217;m not sure about. My guess is you&#8217;d have to treat IM the same as email, only speeded up a lot. In this case you&#8217;d own copyright on your half of the conversation. Of course, IANAL, talk to a real lawyer before doing anything dangerous.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://anirudhsanjeev.org/a-sneaky-little-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anirudhsanjeev.org/a-sneaky-little-idea/#comment-607</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, that raises the question that: who ultimately owns your email and your chat transcripts.
I couldn&#039;t find much on the internet, but there&#039;s a legal department at work, which might help me out with this&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But turns out these kind of conversations are not exactly &quot;seo friendly&quot;(thank you digital point forums), so the profitability is doubtable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But in this world of DMCAs everywhere, who owns legal right to the content of your chats and under what license? that&#039;s something that isn&#039;t discussed much anywhere.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that raises the question that: who ultimately owns your email and your chat transcripts.
I couldn&#8217;t find much on the internet, but there&#8217;s a legal department at work, which might help me out with this</p>

<p>But turns out these kind of conversations are not exactly &#8220;seo friendly&#8221;(thank you digital point forums), so the profitability is doubtable.</p>

<p>But in this world of DMCAs everywhere, who owns legal right to the content of your chats and under what license? that&#8217;s something that isn&#8217;t discussed much anywhere.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iluv</title>
		<link>http://anirudhsanjeev.org/a-sneaky-little-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>iluv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anirudhsanjeev.org/a-sneaky-little-idea/#comment-606</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you&#039;re talking about your end of the conversation, I don&#039;t think I see what the problem is. You probably haven&#039;t signed over copyright to your email host(gmail, for instance, does require that you release some permissions but it doesn&#039;t actually take away your copyright) and you almost certainly haven&#039;t signed it over to the other party. So, if I understand what you&#039;re saying correctly, yes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you mean both ends, then no. The other party still has copyright over their text(all hail the Berne convention).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re talking about your end of the conversation, I don&#8217;t think I see what the problem is. You probably haven&#8217;t signed over copyright to your email host(gmail, for instance, does require that you release some permissions but it doesn&#8217;t actually take away your copyright) and you almost certainly haven&#8217;t signed it over to the other party. So, if I understand what you&#8217;re saying correctly, yes.</p>

<p>If you mean both ends, then no. The other party still has copyright over their text(all hail the Berne convention).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samar Singla</title>
		<link>http://anirudhsanjeev.org/a-sneaky-little-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Samar Singla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anirudhsanjeev.org/a-sneaky-little-idea/#comment-605</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;well anything works in this crazy world..&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well anything works in this crazy world..</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
